Consciousness Sidebar 1 | Print |  E-mail

Drifting off

Consciousness is surprisingly hard to define

It seems like it should be obvious because we experience consciousness all the time.  But our experiences, while interesting, are not, in and of themselves, scientific evidence.  And the science is not yet definitive. As we reported in our consciousness program some researchers believe that, while there is an evolutionary reason for our highly developed minds, there may not be a reason for us to understand how the brain produces that mind.  Is consciousness the same as self-awareness, or attention, or sensation?  Are these subsets of consciousness?  What about the subconscious or nonconscious aspects of our existence?  Philosophers and scientists have been arguing over the definition of consciousness for hundreds of years, if not longer, with no end in sight.

We aren't totally conscious 100% of the time

You, sitting there reading these words, have a much different level of consciousness than, say, a boxer after a knockout punch, a frat boy after one jello shot too many or a patient on the operating table under general anesthesia. And then there's the most familiar shift in consciousness of all, the one that takes up a third of our lives and doesn't require a hangover or a bruise: sleep. Sleep is a dramatic change in consciousness, and perhaps the easiest one to study, since it happens, more or less reliably, every 24 hours in humans and many other living creatures .


What happens during sleep that makes the experience so different from being awake?

Your brain is a huge community of cells, using electrical signals to talk with one another through a complex network of connections.  You might think that, when sleeping, your neurological machinery shuts off -- "out like a light."  But, even during dreamless (NREM) sleep, there's a lot going on.  Scientists can see this using tools that measure the electrical activity at the cortical surface.  Clearly, it is more than just the overall amount of brain activity that determines consciousness.

So much for the out-like-a-light hypothesis.

How does this help us understand consciousness? We might get a clue from Marcello Massimini, Giulio Tononi and their colleagues at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.


They outfitted subjects with special caps covered in sensors so they could see which parts of the brain's surface were sending the strongest signals at any given moment. Then they used a strong, focused pulse of magnetism to create an electrical impulse in a specific spot on the brain's surface, and watched as the brain reacted.


When subjects were awake, the magnetic pulse set off a complicated chain of activity, moving around the brain's surface. Areas far away from the initial point of stimulation buzzed into action and then went quiet as the excitement moved elsewhere. Like a juicy tidbit of gossip jumping from friend to friend by phone, the pulse of activity propagated through different parts of the brain. It eventually faded out after about a third of a second.


But things got interesting when the researchers gave the exact same magnetic pulse to sleeping subjects. Their brains looked like a city where the phone lines had gone down: the juicy-gossip tidbit of neural activity spread only into the immediate vicinity -- to the neighbors over the backyard fence, you might say, who didn't care as much as friends across town might. The activation died out altogether in just half the time than it had in waking subjects.


Remember, the overall level of activity in sleeping brains and awake brains is pretty similar. If you imagine the brain as a city again, the place is full of constant chatter, no matter what. In the awake brain, the city's communication networks are humming away, making it possible for people in distant neighborhoods to trade information and influence each other. But what happens when that network of phones, instant message programs and so on goes dead? Then you only get whatever information is within earshot. People keep talking, but they lose much of their ability to coordinate and organize. The bustling city becomes more like a landscape of small -- and, if you will, sleepy -- villages.
Tononi has a name for the "on-ness" or off-ness" of the brain's telecommunications network: cortical effective connectivity. What we are seeing in the magnet experiment, he says, is a "breakdown in cortical effective connectivity during sleep" -- in fact, that was the title of the 2005 Science article where he, Massimini and others reported the results. Tononi thinks this kind of connectivity is the special quality that creates consciousness.

And what do others think? In the years since the study's publication, other scientists continue to pursue alternative explanations for consciousness. Bernard J. Baars, an Affiliated Fellow in Theoretical Neurobiology at the Neurosciences Institute in La Jolla, California, says "Tononi's is one of the respectable hypotheses around today" -- among many others.

As always in science, the more we learn, the more questions arise. Recently Massimini and Tononi have taken up a new puzzle: what's going on in the brain, in terms of cortical effective connectivity, during REM sleep, when vivid experiences occupy our minds without much stimulus from the outside world? The scientists are using the same transcranial magnetic stimulation method as they did in 2005. So will the search for an explanation of consciousness go on for decades to come, or will REM sleep be the final key?

In your dreams.

Videos

context page: http://www.news.wisc.edu/11611
awake: http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/images/TMS_EEG_wake.wmv
asleep: http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/images/TMS_EEG_sleep.wmv
Tononi lecture about consciousness